Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Rockstar: The story of a narcissistic director


Rockstar is one movie that you really want to like from the onset - even when you haven't watched the trailers. It is difficult to believe that it is made by the same guy who introduced us to the talented Abhay Deol in "Tumsa Nahin Dekha", made us believe that Kareena too can act in "Jab We Met" and made kissing so mainstream in "Love Aaj Kal".  When you see such great directorial talent paired with Ranveer Kapoor - you think what can go wrong! Apparently a lot...
I guess Rockstar may just go down as the movie that introduced us to "Bone Marrow Aplasia".

I would give the movie something like 2 stars. That is similar to what I gave Ra-1.
Let me clarify one thing though. I enjoyed Ra-1 more than Rockstar - but Rockstar has some amazing things going for it that salvage it to those 2 stars.
So -what works?

Ranveer Kapoor

He is outrightly one of the most talented actors in Bollywood right now. Not just that - he is willing to marry that talent with a lot of hard work which sort of seems unweildy for some so called stars. When you see him in Rockstar - you can see the transition from a small town ganwar boy to this quirky star who really doesn't give a damn about anything other than the loves of his life - singing and Heer. You can see that when he is on the screen singing - he is actually giving you the performance that you expect from a Rockstar. The world already knew that Ranveer was a star. But Rockstar will definitely elevate that to an actual "ROCKSTAR". His performance is just awesome - may be one of the best performances of the year. He may even count on this for a Filmfare this year - whatever disappointment the movie might be.

Music in general and Mohit Chauhan in particular

The music is very true to the story of JJ (Ranveer). And it is one of the few things that does not disappoint. One would definitely expect the music to be great given that it is composed by Rahman. But the biggest differentiator is Mohit Chauhan. He has come a long way from "Dooba Dooba" (his Silk Route days) to singing a full-fledged Bollywood album on his own. Prior to Rockstar - he did have a few singles here and there in various movies - some of them also earning him accolades and awards (Masakali from Delhi 6 and Khoon Chala from RDB), but this is his Magnum Opus. No single song might achieve the cult status that "Khoon Chala" has achieved - but as an album, this might just be the best work he ever does. It is doubtful that he will get the opportunity to outshine himself given that we have such amazing male singing talent sitting in Bollywood. And I don't mean that sarcastically - there really is some amazing male singing talent here.

But I guess the "What works" list ends there. And we get to what we are disappointed about.

Story

The story is a breath of fresh air in all the crap that comes along today. It's good to see such original stories - even though I can see why it might not be very popular amongst the masses. When one makes a story about a self-destructive star - it is easier to relate to when it is grounded on reality. If the character is totally fictional, it becomes that much more difficult for the audience to relate to. A real character - however fantastical he / she may be still has the appeal of "No - that really happened" (Raging Bull, Walk the line...). The character of JJ starts as a sweet likeable guy who morphs into this irritating idiot who has no idea what is going on around him. While that may be a possibility for a Rockstar - it becomes slightly difficult to digest.
I would still rate the story pretty high - despite what critique I might have.

Editing

This is by far the third worst thing in the movie (save Nargis and direction). I guess Imtiaz Ali ended up making a 4 hr movie and was stumped on how to convert it to a 150 min version. On more than occasion you end up thinking - what just happened. I really like the idea of a non-linear story - especially when it is well told. I am even a sucker for stories told in parts - but they need to be executed flawlessly (Pulp Fiction, Life in a Metro).  But here, neither the non-linear story, nor the cut and recut editing work for the director.

Nargis Fakhri

Who decided to cast a 32 year has been model as a college girl. I know Bollywood has a problem with miscasting actors in unusually young roles (Aamir Khan in 3 Idiots), but we usually do not do that with actresses. And for heaven's sake, if you want to get a non-actress as your leading lady, make sure the role does not demand acting (that Brazilian model in Love Aaj Kal). This would have been a dream debut for a real actress but Nargis Fakhri just messed it all up so bad.
She is not made for acting. She is a pathetic actress. And she is not even a great dancer - ordinary at best. And she is not pretty enough for us to overlook all her flaws.
Seriously - how bad an actor does one have to be before the director says that's it- you’re done? Or how pretty does one have to be that the director says - I can even overlook all that? In either case, the verdict is simple. Fire her!!!
Imtiaz Ali - I think it's all your fault even though I keep on blaming Miss Fakhri.

Now for the worst - Direction

Such talent - put to such pathetic use. I guess Imtiaz Ali was suffering from a disease - which I like to call "Subhash Ghai syndrome”. This is close to what happened to Mr. Ghai during the making of Taal. Directors think they are totally in tune with the audience - and that is when they loose the grasp. This has happened to others in the past - most notably Sanjay Leela Bhansali (when he made the Blue Film - Sawaria) and less notably with Anurag Kashyap (when he made No Smoking). It is not so much as the director looses the grip on the audience, but the fact that there are multiple things that would tell him during making / editing / viewing / reviewing that something is terribly wrong. But the arrogance just refuses to accept. I am a visionary guy making my VISION. I like to call this part "I think I am Stanley Kubrick syndrome”.

Rockstar on some level -is a very narcissistic movie where Imtiaz Ali is so convinced that this is absolutely the right thing to do - that he refuses to believe otherwise. The result is an amazing performance by Ranveer Kapoor, amazing singing by Mohit Chauhan in an otherwise doomed film.

I sincerely hope that the next venture of Imtiaz Ali is more rooted in reality and is made up of slightly more believable characters, and has a good actress - you know the kind that can act!

Friday, December 2, 2011

The future of Blackberry


There was some recent news on RIM getting heavier into corporate services and starting to provide security solutions for Android / Iphone.

I read a few different notes on how this might go for RIM – some liking it and some hating it.
I had a different take – a purely hypothetical scenario that I wanted to share here.
As a caveat – please do not take anything I mention here as any type of investment advice. This is just some thoughts that are coming out of my head.

Who benefits most from this?

I think the biggest beneficiaries from this would be IPhone and Android manufacturers – and not RIM. Over the last few years, RIMs customer base in the developed world has been shrunk to just the corporate customers. There might be some here and there – but basically those are few and far between. Also – an exceedingly large number of those people who are forced to carry a company Blackberry have started carrying 2 phones now – one BB and one IPhone / Android phone. Once BB offers a solid security solution for IPhone / Android, which basically means that firms that oly offer BB to their employees no longer have to do that.
So – in the first round, all the folks who carry 2 phones drop their BBs. In the 2nd round – all the folks who only have BB drop their BB when their contract expires.  Within 2 years of BB launching this service, the total number of BB phones on the market can go down drastically.
On the other hand, as firms move to a device independent security platform, employee choice rules and the biggest beneficiaries from that are Apple / HTC / Samsung / Google (Motorola).

What happens to RIM then?

Well – that is the big question. Why will RIM launch a service that bleeds them to death – as if they are not bleeding enough? I think this launch marks a very important inflection point in the history of RIM – if they survive the next few years.
This will be the pivotal service that transforms their business model from a device manufacturer to a service provider. Over the period of next few years – you may see that RIM’s doings have significantly reduced the device driven revenue but may end up increasing services driven revenue. Now – that may look like a bad thing. Instead of a $500 phone, you end up selling some service. There is no way you can end up charging 500 over a period of 2 years as the service that RIM intends to provide. It turns out to approx $21 per month.
Then – why would they do that. One thing to note is that the margins on such services may end up being twice that of device margins (save Apple of course). Also – the universe that they target now expands significantly. More and more companies have started moving to device independent strategies already. If RIM can offer them a solution to get back to the same or higher level of security, they might just come back to RIM.
And all said and done – do they have another option???